PSAT Writing and Language Practice Question 335
Question: 335
Gause's Law: It's a Competition
By the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, scientists had observed many ecological 1 principles, including the principle of competition. In this principle, different organisms or species compete for a limited supply of a certain resource. Scientists posited that whenever two species are in competition, they will not coexist with constant population sizes. 2 To prevent going extinct, a species can either evolve or develop a new niche—the species's unique role in a certain environment. While this idea had been proposed earlier, biologist Georgy Gause was 3 born in Moscow, Russia, in 1910.
[1] In order to demonstrate this theory, Gause conducted a laboratory experiment. [2] He used two species of Paramecium (a type of microscopic organism) known as P. aurelia and P. caudatum. [3] To test the theory of competitive exclusion, Gause also combined the two species and observed what happened. [4] For the experiment, he created separate groups of each organism as control groups. [5] He provided the control and combined groups with the same amount of food and water and used a sample to determine the population of each species every day. [6] He wanted to see whether the two species would grow equally 4 well or whether, as the principle of competitive exclusion suggests, one group would become dominant and overtake the other. 5
6 The experiment contradicted scientists' expectations. In the control groups, the two species had similar populations to each other. However, in the group that was combined, 7 Gause saw no clear pattern: as the two species competed for resources, P. aurelia emerged as the dominant organism. Initially, the two species grew at a similar rate, but P. aurelia soon surpassed P. caudatum and approached the population levels seen in the individual groups. P. caudatum decreased in population, 8 but it later increased and caused the P. aurelia to go extinct.
Scientists continue to study competitive exclusion today, among plants, animals, and even humans, and Gause's experiments are credited for demonstrating this ecological idea experimentally. 9 Ecologists know that, at least under the controlled conditions of a laboratory, 10 when two species compete for the same resources, one will overtake the other one.
At this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence.
That is, one species will benefit from a certain advantage it has and increase its population, and the other species could eventually go extinct.
Should the writer make this addition here?
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
Note the question! The question asks whether a sentence should be added, so it's testing consistency. If the content of the new sentence is consistent with the ideas surrounding it, then it should be added. The paragraph discusses the definition of the principle of competition. The new sentence clarifies part of this definition, so it is consistent with the ideas in the text; the sentence should be added. Eliminate (C) and (D). Keep (A) because it is consistent with the purpose of the new sentence. The sentence after the new sentence mentions extinction, and this sentence introduces it as a possibility. Eliminate (B) because the new sentence does not explain the significance of Gause's research, as Gause is not mentioned here at all. The correct answer is (A).